Sunday, June 26, 2011
Election Wish
When he said that, I was hoping he was considering:-
1. To conduct election only upon expiry of every 5 years term with dates of next election to be announced right after conclusion of each election. No more guessing games. No more waiting for inspiration for the election dates. No more jokes about next election dates. Just simple, the end of the 5 years with dates decided and announced at the beginning of the term.
2. The ruling party would stop using any and all government machineries for the benefit of the ruling party. Complete and visible separation between government and political party activities at all time. No more instant project during elections. No more announcement of new project during elections. No more promises of new projects during elections.
3. The party he is heading would lead the way for a clean and positive campaigning. His party would from now on endeavour to stand on it's strength and not on the opposition's weakness. Meaning, instead of working to discredit the oppositions to make his party look good, they would work to better his party so that his party would not only look good but actually become better.
But then he was also reported to say "In this context, Najib urged party members to create a winning alliance by forging relations and links with various levels and groups in society in their respective areas to ensure public support for the party".
Well of course, what was I thinking. Who am I. Why would the election or anything at all go according to my wish?
'Public can decide if it's Anwar'?
"Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said yesterday he was leaving it to the public to decide whether the man in the video clip is opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.
"This is something they have to judge for themselves. The most important thing is to determine the authenticity and find the truth.
1. Kita semua kena bersedia untuk menonton klip video tersebut supaya boleh membuat penilaian masing-masing?
2. Klip video tersebut akan dimainkan di semua stesen tv supaya keseluruhan rakyat boleh menontonnya dan membuat penilaian masing-masing?
3. Pihak kerajaan akan menerbitkan klip video tersebut dalam bentuk VCD atau DVD atau bentuk apa jua pun untuk edaran, samaada secara percuma atau untuk dijual kepada sesiapa yang mahu membuat penilaian?
Apa pun, wajarkah Perdana Menteri mengeluarkan kenyataan sebagai yang dilaporkan? Ataupun adakah NST tersalah lapor?
Sejak akhir-akhir ini, saya sering berharap agar akhbar di Malaysia sentiasa berusaha melaporkan yang benar tetapi apabila melihat laporan tertera di atas, saya berharap akhbar Malaysia berhenti melaporkan. Ya, berhenti melaporkan. Biar kami rakyat hidup aman tanpa berita.
Monday, December 7, 2009
Behave, Public Are Watching
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Istiqamah - Kunci Kerakyatan Malaysia?
Thursday, November 26, 2009
HARAM Kursus Biro Tata Negara?
Sunday, August 16, 2009
Betul dan Salah 3
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Betul dan Salah 2
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
The Pen is Mightier than the Sword
Ever heard of the saying ‘The Pen is Mightier than the Sword’? These words of wisdom was probably coined during the time when all fights and wars was won through physical strength and some people only starts to believe fights and wars could or should be won through wisdom. For all I know, those beautiful words were first introduced as a phrase after some fight or war was won through wisdom instead of sheer brute strength and sharp swords.
It may be of benefit to me and others if I could research the origin of the phrase. Who first introduce it, when, where, how and why. Yet again, for the purpose of this piece, I believe it’s sufficed to assume that the ‘why’ has something to do with writing and writers. Who else would use a pen but a writer or at least someone who writes? What else is a pen good for except writing? A warrior would not want to go to a war with only a pen or even many pieces of pens as his combat weapon, especially when the enemy draw on long sharp swords as weapon.
Of course one could use a pen as weapon and win a fight. Sudden attack as in an attempted robbery may be foiled if the victim is fast in drawing his pen, open it’s cover and thrust the sharp tip on the body of the attacker, where it could cause a severe pain. The pain would very unlikely kill the attacker but the pain would definitely distract the attacker. The distraction may allow enough time and space for the victim to stage further counter attack or run to safety.
For some reason, some hooligan may get very angry with you and challenge you to a fight. You refuse but the hooligan insists to settle the score there and then. As all you have on you, which can resemble a weapon, is a piece of pen you may just wield the pen as weapon to defend yourself and counter attack. The probability of you winning the fight would be very slim unless you are a martial art practitioner who practices regularly thus achieve the level of expert. Even if so, you would probably think more than twice if the hooligan wield a long, shiny and sharp samurai sword.
Pen as a physical weapon would very unlikely help anyone to win a fight, battle and war, as well illustrated in the two scenarios. Yet the saying goes, the ‘Pen is Mightier than the Sword. I believe then, the phrase must be referring to writings. Words written in such a way that it affect the readers. Words written in such a way that brings about different level of understanding. Words written that trigger a change in perspective.
It cannot be just referring to any written words. For words to be mightier than swords, they must be thought provoking. Words that form into sentences and paragraphs that influences the readers to act differently.
For a pen to produce such writing it must be moved by a hand which is controlled by a sharp mind. Not just any hand. Not just any mind. Quality of an article depends on the mind that controls the hand holding the pen and not the quality of the pen itself. The price of the pen would have no bearing in the result except maybe on the appearance of the writing.
Today, pen is hardly used for writing. Most writing results from tapping of many small buttons on an instrument widely known as keyboard which is connected to other instruments known as processor and screen. The physical appearance of the instruments may be very different compared to a pen but production of writing still depends very much on the fingers tapping the keyboards. Fingers controlled by the mind, just as the fingers that hold a pen to write.
Quality, brand and price of a pen bear no impact to the quality of writing. Quality, brand, price, speed and size of a computer also bring about no impact to the quality of a commentary. Even if a writer use a computer that is so powerful, equipped with a very big keyboard, the result of his writing still depends on the mind that control the fingers tapping on the keyboard.
The adage ‘The Pen is Mightier than the Swords’ holds true only when the mind that controls the hand is sharper than the sword. A piece of writing will have great positive impact when the mind of the writer instructs the fingers to tap the right key at the right sequence.
Human mind is not physical but works from a set of physical being that is located inside the human skull. The physical being is normally referred to as brain. The physical brain consists of many parts, each with specific functions to run the human body system. Details on brain and brain function would require much more than 39,339 pages to be added to this posting and that would render this posting unreadable to most and lose the intended impact. To avoid that, explanation on the brain function would focus on it’s effect on writings as viewed from a popular perspectives.
This generalisation made by the popular view may be too broad to the extent of being seen as pseudoscientific. Nevertheless, the broad explanation is still applicable to the majority of the cases thus prove it more right than wrong. Most importantly, it helps us better understand the what, why and how’s of a creative endeavour which includes but not limited to writings.
This generalisation is with regard to grouping the many physical parts of brain to only two significant groups, the left and right side. Both these sides consist of various brain elements. The left brain predominantly function as the logical processor while the right brain function as the creative side. The actual functionality of these two sides of brains may still differ from one person to another. Most glaring is the finding that in left-handed person, the sides and functions are generally the other way round.
Although not precise in all cases, it is safe to assume the left-logical and right-creative functionality as basis for further discussion in this observation. At this juncture, it is only proper to note again that the mind is not the physical form of the brain but the result of what is happening in the two sets of brain. Effectively, this means the capability and state of mind very well depend on how the two set of brains works.
Human mind would not function properly in the absence of any one side of the brain. In most cases, the two sides of brains just work while in some other cases the two sides work together as a team. Although in both cases the brain works and thus form a mind, the difference between ‘working’ and ‘working together as a team’ can be very obvious.
People with both side of brain working are average people. They form the majority of people living in this world. Average people are everywhere. They live their lives as a normal people. They like and dislike what other people normally like and dislike. They do things that normal people do and refrain from doing what other normal people refrain from doing. They think just as another average people think. They form opinion the way most other people shape their opinion. Their mind function well enough for them to live as normal people. Just well enough.
When both side of the brain work together as a team, the result is exceptional. Not just exceptional in any way but exceptional in a positive sense. People blessed with this set of brains are extraordinary. Because of their state of mind, it is normal for them to be known as brilliant or even genius. These are not average or normal people. Their numbers are much smaller than the average people.
The brilliant and genius think in a different way compared to the average. Even among themselves, they think differently. They do things the average people refrain from doing. They achieve more than the average because they not only work hard but smart. While the average are contented just being a follower, the brilliant would always strive to lead others. While the average is comfortable with what they achieve, the brilliant make every effort to always improve. The brilliant and genius always produce something that is remarkably superior.
At the other end of the bell curve, lives another group of people. Just as anybody else, this group of people also bring with them the two sets of brain. Just as everybody else, the right-creative and left-logical sets of brain are right there, snuggled within their respective skulls. The physical being of these people are generally the same as the average and the brilliant.
Despite the similarity, one particular aspect of the mind sets the vast difference even when compared to the average. The disparity is only in the character of the two brain sets. This character sets the daft from the average and brilliant.
The daft has both brain sides intact but one side of the brain is lost and the other is out looking for it. The left brain is lost and the right is out looking for it. The left-logical side is lost and working hard to look for the way home. The right-creative side gets lonely and is trying hard to get the logical side home. The lost side may even be the right-creative and the one looking for it is the left-logical side. With this happening, both the brain sides are always busy. One is busy looking for the way home while the other busy looking for the lost side.
Naturally, with both the sides busy, they are no time left for them to work, let alone work together as a team. The logical side has no time to be logical while the creative side has no time to be creative. One is lost and the other is busy trying to locate it.
Note:
"The pen is mightier than the sword" is a metonymic adage coined by English author Edward Bulwer-Lytton in 1839 for his play Richelieu; Or the Conspiracy.